Safe exit

Self-reflection tool

This resource is part of the Lived experience partnerships toolkit.

We recommend working through this self-reflection tool before you start partnerships with people with lived experience.

What is this tool for?

This tool is designed to support you to reflect critically and work in a way that is more ethical, reduces the chances of negative impacts, and ultimately leads to better outcomes for children and families.

It might also contribute to you feeling increased meaningfulness and commitment to your work.

How and when should you use it?

To get the most out of it, you’re encouraged to try exploring these reflective questions in curious, inclusive and non-judgemental spaces with colleagues and others who have different worldviews and lived experiences from you. Your most valuable companions in this work will be curiosity and openness to hearing your ideas reflected back and being challenged.

This tool is most useful when completed with others, and regularly revisited. Reflection works best when it is undertaken across a whole organisation, not just in one team or role. When people at different levels – from executives and managers through to project staff – engage with these questions, it helps shift culture, surface assumptions, and build shared language and accountability for the work.

Reflecting on who you are and what you bring to this work

  • What are the identities and values that fit for you in your life right now?
  • How often and in what context do you spend time with people who do not fit those identities?
  • How do you think about children and families with different identities to you?
  • Are you familiar with the concept of intersectionality? If not, you might like to watch What is intersectionality? (YouTube)

Figure 2. Social identity wheel

The social identity wheel can help you reflect on what shapes you in life and work. The context always matters – in some contexts you will have power and in some contexts you will not.

Social identity wheel designed by Elizabeth Pearce and Michaela Willi Hooper, Open Oregon Educational Resources, CC BY 4.0.

  • The Social identity wheel is a circle.

    It is made up of three green rings: a large outer ring representing ‘Roles and relationships; a small inner wheel representing ‘Individual characteristics’; and a ring in between them representing ‘Social identities’.

    Between the Roles and relationships and Social identities rings there six ‘segments’ representing: Jobs, Professional, Family, Friendships, Interests, Hobbies.

    Between the Social identities and Individual characteristics rings there are 16 segments representing: Sexuality, Body shape, Age, Religion, First language, Culture, Geography, Nationality, Ethnicity, Race, Socioeconomic status, Health, Ability, Neurodiversity, Gender and Sex.

    In the centre of the Individual characteristic ring at the centre of the circle there are six segments: Behaviours, Beliefs, Goals, Skills, Motivations, Values.

Remember, this is a simplified learning tool. In reality, there aren’t clear boundaries between the dimensions of identity. All these things are interconnected and relate dynamically with our shifting contexts. But it can be a useful way to start making visible aspects of our social location and thinking about how power relations shape what we have, how we think, what we value, and how we act.

What assumptions do you notice you hold about people who are:

  • infants
  • children
  • young people
  • in single parent families
  • from different ethnic or cultural backgrounds than you
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
  • migrants or refugees
  • LGBTQIA+
  • in families that are different to yours, whether that be blended, foster/kinship, same-sex or multigenerational
  • higher weight
  • visibly disabled
  • living in poverty
  • living with mental illness or distress
  • unemployed
  • incarcerated?

Where do your assumptions come from?

How do these assumptions relate to your identities and values you reflected on earlier in this tool?

Assumptions about infants and children

Often, the mental health of youth is privileged over that of infants and children. Likewise, the mental health of individuals is often privileged over that of families.

The Five perspective shifts can help support reflections about assumptions we make about infants and children in their families and social environments.

Possible perspective shifts on infants and children

To what extent do you only see infants and children as … What might become possible if you also see children as … We can see this as a perspective shift from …
… innocent, vulnerable and passive? … active in shaping their own lives; able to make meaning of their experiences; possessing an array of skills, know-how, creativity and imagination; and guided by values, beliefs and hopes? … passive to active

 

… naive and inarticulate? … possessing significant knowledge, language and understandings to define and describe both problems and solutions? … naive to knowledgeable

 

… passive recipients of services? … skilled and capable collaborators in the task of finding useful responses to problems and can make helpful contributions to others facing similar circumstances? … recipients to contributors

 

… how they fit into mental health diagnoses or developmental categories? … having views and experiences that exist in broader contexts, circumstances and relationships that surround them that they can evaluate? … categories to context

 

To what extent do you see your work as primarily accountable to … What might be possible if you also saw your work as accountable to … We can see this as a perspective shift from…
… your organisation, funder and evidence-based literature? … those less powerful: the child, their parents and other concerned adults? … top-down to bottom-up accountability

 

 

Thinking about privilege and systems of inequality

‘It takes ongoing work and learning to recognise the privileges many of us have access to, because we often take them for granted and are not taught to notice or name them as we grow up. We can assume that everyone has the same opportunities and resources, and a common reflex is to deny someone else’s experience when it doesn’t match our own. It is often easier to see the privileges we do not have access to, but even these can be difficult to name, and we may be more likely to interpret them as personal failure rather than systemic disadvantage.’

– Lived Experience Coordinator

It can also be complicated to understand how you can experience privilege and disadvantage simultaneously, and how they can shift across our lives and in different contexts. It’s possible to experience hardship and suffering in life and still have access to privilege.

Unpacking this requires courageously stepping away from defensiveness and towards vulnerability and curiosity. This is especially important for navigating the shame that may arise from beginning to comprehend your privilege and understanding more about what it means for children and families who don’t access to it.

To get started on thinking about and naming examples of privilege and disadvantage, take a look at out this privilege checklist and the following diagram demonstrating systems of inequality.

In the following adaption of Nixon’s (2019) coin model of privilege and critical allyship, the top of the coin represents the privilege of those who experience advantages that others don’t, because of who they happen to be, not because they earned it.

The coin represents the social structure that produces and maintains inequality (e.g. sexism, racism, ableism).

The bottom of the coin represents the oppression of those who experience disadvantage that others don’t, because of who they happen to be, not because they earned it.

These systems of inequality interact with one another and shape complex patterns of advantage and disadvantage. People may experience privilege in some ways and disadvantage in others depending on how these systems intersect in their lives.

Figure 3: System of inequality coin intersections

Note: The systems shown are examples and do not represent all forms of inequality.

  • In this figure, systems of inequality are represented by a 3-D, blank silver coin.

    The top of the coin represents privilege, and is associated with the labels:
    White (Racism)
    Non-Indigenous (Settler colonialism)
    Non-disabled (Ableism)
    Heterosexuality (Heteronormativity)
    Cisgender (Cisnormativity)
    A man (Sexism)
    And experiencing socioeconomic advantage (Classism)

    The bottom of the coin represents oppression, and is associated with the labels:
    Culturally and racially diverse (Racism)
    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Settler colonialism)
    People with disability (Ableism)
    LGBTQIA+ (Heteronormativity)
    Trans and gender diverse (Cisnormativity)
    And experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage (Classism)

‘The intersecting nature of the coins … produces complex patterns of advantage and disadvantage.’

- Nixon, 2019

For reflection

  • What privileges do you have, or not have, access to in different contexts?
  • What kind of knowledge do you value most – literature evidence, practitioner knowledge, lived experience knowledge, folk knowledge or lore? How did you come to value that form of knowledge?

Reflecting on possible intersections with you and your workplace

Think about how this might intersect with you and your workplace by considering the following questions.

The knowledge your organisation values

  • What knowledge does your organisation privilege? What influences the way your service is delivered? Who benefits from this?
  • What are the ways that systems of privilege and oppression shaped you – and your colleagues’ – education, training or the history of your field(s) of practice? Who benefits from this?
  • What does it mean to treat lived experience as a legitimate form of evidence, equal to academic and clinical knowledge?

Assumptions about the people your organisation exists to support

  • How do you think privilege influences what is considered ‘normal’, ‘acceptable’ or ‘healthy’ in your field of work? Who benefits from this?
  • What are the systems of inequality your organisation might be embedded in (e.g. structures such as policies, practice guidelines, and/or hierarchies of knowledge or power)?
  • What power does your organisation hold that might influence your interactions with children and families?
  • In what ways do your organisational structures and systems perpetuate or challenge existing patterns of oppression for children and families?
  • Do any of the way people in your organisation respond to distress experienced by children or families reenact power-over violence?
  • How does your organisational culture promote diversity, inclusion, and equity for children and families? What are some ways this could be improved?

Reflecting on your responses to privilege and assumptions

Consider a time you noticed a privilege that others have that you do not.

  • What is it like to notice that?
  • How possible does it feel to make that visible to those with privilege?

Consider a time a person has made harmful, stigmatising or inaccurate assumptions about you.

  • What kinds of effects did/does that have?
  • How did/does it shape your relationship with that person?

Consider a time you realised you made harmful, stigmatising or inaccurate assumptions about children or families you encounter in your organisation.

  • What made it possible for you to notice that?
  • How did you respond?
  • What might make it hard for them to let you know or to see the effects of your assumptions?
  • What might it take for them to point this out – especially if it is an assumption they are up against regularly? What might be at stake for them?
  • How could you make it more possible for people to give you feedback? (Remembering that people with lived experience should not be expected to educate you, you are responsible for doing the work.)
  • How might your identity, privileges, beliefs and assumptions impact how you make sense of information or interpret or evaluate the experiences of the children or families you work with?
  • We all interpret information through our own worldview by default. What could you do to navigate this?

Ideas for lifelong learning

Understanding, making visible and dismantling systems of privilege and oppression is a lifelong undertaking which requires that you continue to making space to hear the perspectives of others. Some ways to do the work might include the following:

  • Reading books and articles, or attending workshops to learn about different perspectives and knowledges.
  • Listening to and believing people when they tell you about their experiences of disadvantage and the effects it has on their life.
  • Discussing these ideas and asking others you trust to hold you accountable for rigorous feedback.

You might also be interested to read How ready, willing and able are you to embark on an authentic co-design process?

More tools and resources to support you to dive deep into unpacking privilege include:

References

Nixon, S. A. (2019). The coin model of privilege and critical allyship: Implications for health. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1637. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7884-9

Pearce E. B. (2021). Contemporary families in the US: An equity lens (2nd ed.). Open Oregon Education Resources.

Discover more resources

Subscribe to our newsletters